Jerusalem — An Israeli official stated on Sunday that Israel has conveyed “serious security concerns” to the White House regarding a proposed disarmament deal with Hamas. The comments mark some of the first public reactions from Israel since the deal was announced by U.S. President Donald Trump.
Details surrounding the disarmament framework have remained limited, but the official emphasized that security considerations are central to any agreement with the Palestinian militant group that governs Gaza. Israel reportedly stressed that verification mechanisms, enforcement, and the risk of Hamas retaining or regaining military capabilities must be addressed to prevent renewed violence.
The White House has described the proposal as a pathway to reducing tensions and building stability in the Gaza Strip, where a long-running blockade and periodic clashes have caused significant humanitarian concerns. The plan reportedly envisions steps toward Hamas disarming its military wing, potentially accompanied by international monitoring and support for Gaza’s civilian infrastructure.
Israel’s concern centers on ensuring that any disarmament is verifiable and irreversible, with strong consequences for non-compliance and clear triggers for escalation if the group breaches terms. Officials in Jerusalem have previously urged that disarmament not be used as a political cover for broader gains without tangible security guarantees.
Reaction from other regional actors has been mixed, with some officials calling for cautious engagement to avert renewed fighting, while others warn against rewarding militant groups without enforceable disarmament and accountability provisions. Humanitarian groups have urged any agreement to include robust protections for civilians, alongside measurable steps to ease the Gaza blockade and improve access to essential aid.
As discussions continue, analysts say the United States faces a difficult balance between advancing peacemaking efforts and addressing legitimate Israeli security concerns. The timing and content of the formal agreement remain unclear, and it is not yet certain when or if a final framework will be presented for congressional or public review.